THE TASK FORCE SET UP BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA TO RECOVER THE GOVERNMENT LANDS AND OTHER PROPERTIES WHICH HAVE VIOLATED SOME OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS IN PATTANDUR AGRAHARA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALOE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE, SOLD BY THE ORIGINAL ALLOTTEE TO ONE OF THE BUILDER IS IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE ALLOTMENT CONDITIONS AND THE GOVERNMENT HAD RESERVED THE RIGHTS TO RECOVER OR TAKE IT BACK, IF THE CONDITION IS VIOLATED OR NOT MET. IN THIS CASE, IT IS CLEARLY SEEN THAT THE ORIGINAL ALLOTTEE HAS CLEARLY AND EXPLICITLY AND DELIBERATELY VIOLATED THE CONDITION AND THE TASK FORCE HAS DETECTED THIS ANOMALY AND THE MATTER IS REPORTED TO THE GOVERNMENT TO RECOVER THE LAND. THE TASK FORCE HAS RECOMMENDED A STERN ACTION ON THE ERRING OFFICER.
THE UNSUSPECTING BUYERS WILL BE IN SOUP, IF THE PROPERTY/APARTMENT IN PATTANDUR AGRAHARA IN THAT PARTICULAR SURVEY NUMBER IS BOUGHT.
WATCH OUT: BIG GAMES AND BIG NAMES AND THE LAW OF THE COUNTRY WILL TAKE ITS OWN COURSE AND THE BUYERS WILL BE LEFT IN LURCH.
4 thoughts on “WATCH OUT- BUYING AN APARTMENT OR VILLA IN PATTANDUR AGRAHARA FROM A XXXXXX BUILDER”
Fake Information is updated by some real estate people about the reputed builders, due to the competition market and the high value lands. If this is true, why can’t this been published in News papers by now? From where the source of information has come? is there any official announcement about this in any government websites?
It is not fake. This action had been initiated by the Task Force, Revenue Department, Govt of Karnataka, instituted to look into the violation and other aspects. The particular case is that the vendor, acquires the land declaring it that it will be used for industrial purpose and thus will provide employment to many, power will be utilised, local products will be used and the govt will get taxes. But, the crooked vendor and the supposed to be the buyer nexus, who bought the property at a throwaway price, tried to cheat the Government and the people and there was a clear cut condition, if the lessee violates any of the clauses the sale will automatically gets cancelled.
Read all the newspapers.
PATTANDURU AGRAHARA LAND, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE, WAS ALLOTTED TO XXX XXX XXXXX FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSE, WITH A CONDITION THAT IT MUST BE USED FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE, SO THAT THE LOCALITES GET THE JOBS AND ALL THE NATURAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE ARE UTILISED AND THE GOVT GET THE TAXES, BUT THEY SOLD IT TO XXXXXXX AND VIOLATED THE CLAUSES OF ALLOTMENT. THE BUILDERS ARE ALREADY UNDER SCRUTINY BY MANY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
I want to purchase a 5 acres parcel of land which is located next to a Railway track. The land parcel starts exactly at the boundry line of the property of the Southern Railway track which goes to Dodabelapur. This boundry line of the Railway property extends by exactly 15 mts on either side of the Railway track . The proposed property starts after this boundry line and the width of the propert is exactly 150 feet (45.73)mt. As I wish to develop this property and construct Town Houses (Ground + 3 floors)
I have been told by the Railway Authority that I would need an NOC from them in case the development is abutting any land within 30 mts from the boundry line of the Railway Property. Considering that I leave this requisite of 30 mts from the Railway property I am still left with about 50 feet of land on which I can still plan something subject to the BBMP bylaws for building set backs. Now in case the BBMP also stipulates that I have to leave the required set backs of lets say 5 mts starting from the 30 mts mark line then I would again have to deduct another 5 + 5 for front and back set backs in which case I would be left with only 17. 20 ft (50 – 32.80 = 17.20) mts which will be useless for any development.
The only way I possibly can succeed to accomplish some development on this land is if the BBMP agrees to consider my building set backs from the property line itself and not from beyond the 30 mts mark line as I would already be leaving way beyond the BBMP requisite of 5 mts as my building line would fall outside the barrier of 30 mts (98.40 ft) which is way above the 5 mts set back requsite of the BBMP
Apart from the above my other apprehension is if at all the BBMP does agree to consider my set backs from the property line and the building line beyond the 30 mts mark line I would still need free land to construct at least a 30 ft wide road for the Town houses and if at all the Railways will give me permission to build at least this road in my own property within the 30 mts which is being left open.
Although I have spoken to many people in the BBMP there is no written bylaw text addressing such an issue. I would deeply appreciate if you could advise me how to get the right and accurate information or a legal and binding confirmation which will help me to decide whether this project is possible or not.
Thanking you and kind regards,
We regret to state, we might not be able to guide you in this regard.
Comments are closed.