PRESTIGE WHITE MEADOWS – PATTANDUR AGRAHARA – WHITEFIELD ????


The suit regarding the industrial land in survey no.42, pattandur Agrahara, allotted to Joy Ice Cream for industrial purpose at a very cheaper rate by the Government with a condition that the allotted land MUST ONLY BE USED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSE, the said property was sold to prestige group, and the builder obtained the sanction of building plan and began the construction.  In the meanwhile, the STF discovered the discrepancy and recommended that the land be vested with the state as it had violated the conditions of sale.  The Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, resumed the said property.

The builder approached the court and as usual obtained a stay order ( the simple strategy of the builders to hoodwink the investors and buyers)  to the said resumption.  Mr.Hiremutt, a social activist, fighting many such cases, is said to have issued a paper statement, which the high court felt it as derogatory and summoned Mr.Hiremutt.

This subject will reach the apex court soon.

But, the investors and the buyers have to be satisfied that there is a STAY ORDER and there are no answers for:

1). Whether the property allotted by the state specifically for the industrial activity be used for other purposes?

a). The land acquired from poor farmers at throwaway prices and allotted to the industries with all facilities, so that the industries generate employment, use the locally available natural resources, consume the electricity, generate revenue to the Government in the form of VAT, Excise, Service Tax, Professional Tax and Income Tax.  The intention of the state to provide land and infrastructure is for the development and not for the profit of a group by selling the land thus allotted.

b). The builder MUST have obtained NOC for the change of land use from KIADB, but might have not obtained the same.

c). The change of land use condition need not be specified at all as it is implied.

d). It is crystal clear that the builder has violated and also obtained the building plan without obtaining the NOC from KIADB and BDA`s role in the sanction of the plan must be investigated.

2). Filing of Writ Petition will not entitle or grant the right, title and interest to the plaintiff.  It will be conferred only by the decree of the court.  Hence, the consoling words like, the subject matter is in the court, does not have any validity at all.

The affected investors and buyers are sitting in the corner of their home, cribbing and crying, watching the episode without a murmur.

There are some more like this.  The skeletons will tumble out one by one.

BUYERS OF PROPERTIES ARE TAKEN FOR A RIDE BY BUILDERS/DEVELOPERS/SELLERS


THE BUILDERS/DEVELOPERS/SELLERS HAVE A CLEAR CUT STRATEGY.  IT IS A CLEAR CUT CASE, WHERE THE TITLES ARE DISPUTED OR HAVE DISCREPANCY OR THERE ARE ORIGINAL AND GENUINE CLAIMS AGAINST THE PROPERTY.  THE DEVELOPERS BUY IT OR ENTER INTO A JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT KNOWINGLY WELL AND OFFER THESE PROPERTIES AT ATTRACTIVE PRICES AS `PRE LAUNCH OFFER`.

WHEN THE LITIGATION IS BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE BUYER, THE DEVELOPER NORMALLY AND GENERALLY APPROACHES THE COURT AND GET SOME RELIEF, BUT SUCH RELIEF IS TIME BOUND AND IS VALID TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THE CASE.  BUT THE SHREWD AND NOTORIOUS BUILDER WILL DEFINITELY LOSE THE CASE AND PREFER AN APPEAL AND CONTINUES TO DODGE THE BUYER WITH THIS KIND OF UN DISPOSABLE SUITS AND PROLONG THE SAME.

TOP BUILDERS OF BANGALORE HAVE SEVERAL CASES ON `PRIME PROPERTIES` AND HIDDEN VIOLATIONS OR HAVE OBTAINED BUILDING PLAN APPROVALS IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE PREVAILING LAWS BY MISREPRESENTING THE FACTS.

BEWARE AND DO NOT COMPROMISE ON THE TITLE AND DO NOT BUY PROPERTIES, IF THEY HAVE LITIGATION, EVEN THE BIGGEST OF THE BIGGER DEVELOPER CAN DO `NOTHING` IN THE COURT OF LAW. MANY SUCH CASES ARE PENDING AND ARE AT VARIOUS STAGES IN THE COURTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

BEST WISHES ON THE OCCASION OF DASARA!


WE WISH ALL OUR READERS AND PATRONS A VERY HAPPY DASRA AND NAVARATHRI!

ON THIS OCCASION, WE WISH TO INTIMATE OUR READERS THAT FEW PROPERTIES WHICH ARE DEVELOPED AND SOLD BY LEADING DEVELOPERS HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES.

FREE HINTS OR HITS

DO NOT CALL OR SEND MAILS FOR DETAILS

CHECK FOR YOURSELF

THEY ARE ALL IN ALL WEBSITES AND NEWSPAPERS

ONE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH ONE FULL PAGE AD IN ALL LEADING NEWSPAPERS-ON KANAKAPURA ROAD- HAS SERIOUS LAND REFORM ISSUE!!

THE OTHER ONE, OLD, WHICH IS ALREADY SOLD HAS BEEN REMANDED BY THE HIGH COURT TO THE TRIAL COURT IN BANGALORE SOUTH(BETWEEN HOSUR ROAD AND SARJAPUR ROAD)- ALMOST ALL FLATS AND APARTMENTS SOLD BY THIS BUILDER!!!

GOVINDAA —————–GOVINDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

BMRDA/BIAPPA/APA/HPA/NPA- APPROVALS DOES NOT MEAN THAT TITLES ARE CLEAR


BMRDA/BDA AND DC CONVERSION ORDERS OR LAYOUT APPROVALS DOES NOT CONFER ANY RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST AND EVEN THAT KATHAS ISSUED BY THE BBMP. BMRDA/BDA/BBMP/DC APPROVALS ARE CRYSTAL CLEAR IN THEIR ORDERS THAT THE AUTHORITIES ARE NOT LIABLE NOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY KIND OF LITIGATION.  THE APPROVALS ARE GIVEN ON TECHNICAL BASIS ONLY.  ALL APPROVALS ARE TIME BOUND.

DC CONVERSION ORDERS AND BBMP BUILDING PLAN SANCTION ARE HIGHLY CONDITIONAL.  IF THE CONDITIONS ARE NOT COMPLIED WITH, THEN THE ORDERS OR SANCTIONS AUTOMATICALLY GETS CANCELLED WITHOUT EVEN ISSUING A NOTICE.

BUYERS ARE BEING DUPED BY DECLARING THAT THE LAYOUT IS APPROVED BY BANKS.  BANK APPROVAL OR LOAN APPROVAL DOES NOT CONFER ANY TITLE.

1). ONE SUCH A CASE OF BMRDA APPROVED LAYOUT, VERY CLOSE TO CHANDAPURA CIRCLE, ON HOSUR ROAD IS UNDER LITIGATION.(MOST RECENT LITIGATION) IT IS A GATED(ILLEGAL) COMMUNITY.

2). IN ANOTHER VERY RECENT EXAMINATION, THE APA APPROVED LAYOUT NEAR JIGNI, THE DEVELOPER HAS ALL THE APPROVALS AND BANK APPROVALS TOO, BUT THERE ARE OTHER LEGAL HEIRS, WHO HAVE NOT ACCEPTED THIS TRANSACTION BETWEEN THEIR ANCESTORS AND THE DEVELOPERS.

 

BEWARE, BEFORE BUYING BMRDA OR DC CONVERTED SITES.

LITIGATION-PUBLIC NOTIFICATION-AGAINST THE SALE IN FAVOUR OF XXXXXXXXX PROJECTS


AN HIGHLY ADVERTISED AND MARKETED WITH FANFARE PROJECT BY xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PROJECTS IN KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, HAS BEEN DRAWN INTO LITIGATION BY THE ORIGINAL OWNER, CLAIMS TO BE IN POSSESSION.  THE GPA SALE IS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN EXECUTED IS BEING CHALLENGED AND A PUBLIC NOTIFICATION HAD BEEN PUBLISHED for survey no.193/1 and 195, KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK  BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT.

AN ENQUIRY IS UNDERWAY ON SOME OF THE SURVEY NUMBERS IN THIS VILLAGE AGAINST ILLEGAL DENOTIFICATION BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.