A NEWS REPORT ON ALLEGED VIOLATION

THE LOKAUYKTA COURT HAS DIRECTED THE POLICE TO INVESTIGATE AND SUBMIT THE REPORT ON THE ALLEGED VIOLATION BY THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICIALS IN DENOTIFYING AND SANCTIONING THE BUILDING PLAN FOR A 7 ACRES AND 29 GUNTAS,(1-17 ACRES FOR THE OWNERS/LANDLORDS RESIDENCES) RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX ENTERED INTO BETWEEN SJR DEVELOPERS AND THE SAID LAND LORDS IN  CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN THE DENOTIFICATION ORDER.  

THE PLAINT MR.LAKSHMINARAYAN, HAS SUBMITTED A COMPLAINT TO THE COURT WITH ALL RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND THE COURT FELT THAT IT IS A FIT CASE AND MUST BE INVESTIGATED AS IT FOUND SOME PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE.

THE DEVELOPER AND THE BUYERS ARE IN SERIOUS TROUBLE AND A LONG DRAWN LEGAL BATTLE WILL ENSUE. 

THE SURVEY NUMBERS affected ARE:100,100/p AND 101, Arkere village, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District.

EXTENT: 7.29 ACRES.

INVESTIGATION AGAINST : 13 OFFICIALS.

REPORT TO BE SUBMITTED WITHIN, 30TH, MARCH,2012.

CASE: SUPPRESSION OF FACTS.

ISSUE:

THE AFORESAID SURVEY NUMBERS WERE NOTIFIED FOR THE CREATION OF BDA LAYOUT.  THE LAND LORDS CONTENTED THAT THEY HAD BEEN UTILISING THE SAID LANDS AS NURSERY(DEVELOPMENT OF NURSERY,PLANTS, SEEDS AND SEEDLING) BASED ON THEIR APPLICATION, THE GOVERNMENT DENOTIFIED THE SAID LAND ON THE CONDITION, IT MUST BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF GROWING PLANTS, DEVELOPING SEEDLINGS & NURSERY.  IF THE APPLICANTS DEVIATE OR VIOLATE, THE DENOTIFICATION ORDER STANDS AUTOMATICALLY CANCELLED.  ANY DC CONVERSION AND SANCTION OF BUILDING PLAN OBTAINED BY  SUPPRESSING THE FACTS OR HIDING THE TRUTH OR THE CONTENTS OF THE OR THE CONDITIONS OF THE DENOTIFICATION ORDER OR MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS IS BAD IN THE EYES OF LAW OR ILLEGAL.

THE PETITIONER HAS CLEARLY STATED THAT IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE CONDITION LAID DOWN, ON WHICH IT HAD BEEN DENOTIFIED, THE LANDLORDS ILLEGALLY ENTERED INTO A JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT WITH THE BUILDER TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY AND HAS NAMED 13 OFFICIALS, WHO HAD CLEARED THIS PROJECT AND SANCTIONED THE BUILDING PLAN.   EVEN THOUGH, MANY COMPLAINTS WERE LODGED, THE OFFICIALS TURNED BLIND EYE, HENCE THIS PETITION AND INVESTIGATION.

 

8 thoughts on “SJR LUXURIA- SJR DEVELOPERS PROJECT AT BANNERGATTA ROAD (ARAKERE) IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE

  1. Thank you very much Ecopack for rendering the great service of giving information of such layouts to the public who can be trapped by these developers.Many of the documents are fabricated by the developers confusing even the best of lawyers who give legal opinion. People who buy in bangalore south area have to be over cautious because many lands have been forcebly cleared of its inmates who owned revenue sites by land mafia and then with the old land owners construct appartments or make layouts.Even if the site owners have no muscle to fight them,their curse will stay with the land and its so called developers.

    1. Dear Sir,
      Thanks.
      As you are well aware that many details/documents are hidden, suppressed and tampered with, where opinions or reports by the experts cannot be issued at all. But, the so called banks, approve all such projects and the buyers are thrown in to litigation. The borrowers or buyers are under the impression/opinion that `BANK APPROVAL MEANS CLEAR TITLES` and go ahead and buy the problems. The buyers must also exercise utmost caution and must obtain opinion and must also conduct verification of documents at the concerned offices and thoroughly check the originals. It is `BUYER BEWARE`. In a bid to save few thousands, the buyers land themselves in irreparable legal and financial mess worth lakhs.
      B.S.G.
      Advocate.
      ecopackindia team

  2. is there a set suggestions which you have to buyers, as most buyers will go with following
    1. Is it BDA\BBMP approved
    2. The banks like SBI\LIC HFL \ ICICI etc are paid by the buyer to verify the documents by their panel of Lawyers, only then the loan is sanctioned.

    1. Dear Sir,
      1). No.
      All the approvals are technical in nature and BDA/BBMP is not responsible for any and every kind of litigation attracted by the applicant. It is crystal clear in their sanction letter that the civic authorities are not responsible for any such litigation.
      2). In such case, if the property is dispossessed or undergoes a litigation, the institutions must not demand the repayment of the loan sanctioned. But, is it so?
      Please address this question to the BANKS. Read the documents signed by the borrower, before affixing their signatures. You will be shocked and perplexed.
      The loan is sanctioned to the borrower and the property is held as a collateral security, if the borrower, co-applicant and the guarantor, defaults or fails to repay the loan, then, the banks attach the property.
      ecopackindia team

  3. Hello EcopackIndia,

    There seems to be a similar litigation against Neotown Smondoville. Are you aware of this or it’s progress?

    ~V

    1. Dear Sir,
      We do not have details but there were some kind of rumours in the market about it.
      SJR is a confirmed case unlike smondoville.
      ecopackindia team

Comments are closed.